Harris v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that prior convictions could only be considered on the issue of the defendant's credibility and not substantive proof of his guilt
• concluding that the district court erred by refusing to approve a self-defense instruction when the defendant testified that the victim attacked and attempted to rob him
• “The sentencing body may not be precluded from considering any relevant mitigating evidence.”
• \The sentencing body may not be precluded from considering any relevant mitigating evidence.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Blake v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2005-10-20· cited 81×
• Lisle v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1997-06-17· cited 64×
• Vallery v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2002-05-17· cited 31×
• Peck v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2000-08-24· cited 27×
• Hubbard v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2018-08-02· cited 15×
• Geary v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1994-03-30· cited 14×
• Ducksworth v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1997-07-15· cited 12×
• Davis v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2014-03-27
• HUBBARD (CORY) VS. STATE
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2018-08-02