Skip to main content

Harris v. State

Citations

  • 615 S.E.2d 532
  • 279 Ga. 522
  • 2005 Fulton County D. Rep. 2017
  • 2005 Ga. LEXIS 446

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the trial court’s error in admitting hearsay by two declarants to explain an officer’s conduct was harmless because one of the declarants later told the jury the same information
  • concluding it was highly probable that officer’s hearsay testimony to explain his conduct, which was cumulative, did not contribute to the guilty verdicts
  • where defendant testifies she had no felony convictions, it was error to allow the State to impeach with evidence of misdemeanor convictions
  • State is authorized to present evidence of prior convictions when a defendant makes his good character an issue at trial
  • the general rule is that an officer cannot testify to hearsay statements in order to show his motive or explain his conduct
  • admission of defendant’s prior convictions was harmless in light of defendant’s admissions during his testimony before the State brought up his convictions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Benham, Thompson, Hines

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

40 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.