Skip to main content

Brooks v. State

Citations

  • 458 S.E.2d 349
  • 265 Ga. 548

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • the defendant’s pro se appeal concerning the effectiveness of appellate counsel was premature since the representation was still ongoing when the claim was raised and the trial court had not considered the claim
  • A brief filed by an appellant pro se, seeking to assert an additional claim of error not asserted in the brief filed by his attorney, was not entitled to consideration because the appellant was represented by counsel in the pending appeal and could not also represent himself.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Benham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.