Skip to main content
E.D. Pennsylvania· 12/31/1986

Harris v. Pernsley

Citations

  • 113 F.R.D. 615
  • 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15787

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that “the [DA] was not entitled to wait for ‘official notice’ of a proposed settlement to attempt to intervene” but rather, “was required to move to intervene as soon as he knew or should have known that his interests were no longer adequately protected”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shapiro

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.