Maudra NEVILLES Et Al., Appellants, v. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION and Union Electric Company, Appellees

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming denial of intervention after entry of judgment as untimely where proposed intervenors did not show they lacked “knowledge of the suit during its pendency which would justify the delay in filing their motion”
• affirming denial of intervention where “[t]he district court could reasonably have determined that [movants] did not allege or prove that they had no knowledge of the suit during its pendency which would justify the delay in filing their motion”
• how far proceedings have gone, prejudice which delay might cause to other parties, and reasons for delay
• how far proceedings have gone, prejudice which delay might cause to other parties, and reasons for delay
• “[T]he burden was on [movants] to demonstrate that they had no notice of the action and that this was sufficient reason for waiting over a year from commencement of suit, and over two months after entry of judgment, before they moved to intervene.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).