Skip to main content

Harris v. Omelon

Citations

  • 985 A.2d 1103
  • 2009 D.C. App. LEXIS 609
  • 2009 WL 4328728

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “a phone call across state borders ... . is not sufficient to create personal jurisdiction over the defendant” where the defendant is not “regularly conduct[ing] or solicit[ing] business or [pursuing] another persistent course of conduct in D.C.”
  • “The District of Columbia’s long-arm statute is co-extensive with the reach of personal jurisdiction permitted under the Due Process Clause.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ruiz, Oberly, Newman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.