Harris v. Koenig

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the defendants’ argument about differences between named plaintiffs and class members failed to defeat commonality, typicality, or adequacy and noting that a district court has discretion to later consider creating subclasses should a conflict arise
• “[I]n the event that ... a conflict does arise, the Court has discretion to consider creating sub-classes.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Dl v. District of Columbia
  District of Columbia· 2013-11-08· cited 30×
• Daskalea v. the Washington Humane Society
  District of Columbia· 2011-08-10· cited 23×
• Krueger v. Ameriprise Financial, Inc.
  D. Minnesota· 2014-05-23· cited 16×
• Howard v. Liquidity Services, Inc.
  District of Columbia· 2017-09-06· cited 14×
• Burton v. District of Columbia
  District of Columbia· 2011-12-23· cited 12×
• Harris v. Koenig
  District of Columbia· 2011-10-03· cited 5×
• National Security Counselors v. Central Intelligence Agency
  District of Columbia· 2012-07-27· cited 3×
• South Ferry LP 2 v. Killinger
  W.D. Washington· 2011-01-06· cited 2×
• Nio v. United States Department of Homeland Security
  District of Columbia· 2017-10-27
• Borum v. Brentwood Village, LLC
  District of Columbia· 2019-06-11
• Abraha v. Colonial Parking, Inc.
  District of Columbia· 2020-07-31
• In Re: Fannie mae/freddie Mac Senior Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement Class Action Litigations
  District of Columbia· 2021-12-07
• Lee v. ITT Corp.
  W.D. Washington· 2011-06-24

Cites

34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Amchem Products, Inc. v. Windsor
  Supreme Court· 1997-06-25· cited 4,991×
• General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. Falcon
  Supreme Court· 1982-06-14· cited 4,068×
• Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. Russell
  Supreme Court· 1985-06-27· cited 1,937×
• Gulf Oil Co. v. Bernard
  Supreme Court· 1981-06-01· cited 973×
• Ortiz v. Fibreboard Corp.
  Supreme Court· 1999-06-23· cited 776×
• Baby Neal v. Casey
  Third Circuit· 1994-12-15· cited 562×
• LaRue v. DeWolff, Boberg & Associates, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 2008-02-20· cited 371×
• Fox v. American Airlines, Inc.
  D.C. Circuit· 2004-11-30· cited 314×
• Twelve John Does v. District of Columbia, Appellants/cross-Appellees, Nathaniel McQueen Appellees/cross-Appellants
  D.C. Circuit· 1997-07-01· cited 251×
• In Re New Motor Vehicles Can. Export Anti. Lit.
  First Circuit· 2008-03-28· cited 236×
• In re Schering Plough Corp. Erisa Litigation
  Third Circuit· 2009-12-21· cited 212×
• In Re Insurance Brokerage Antitrust Litigation
  Third Circuit· 2009-09-08· cited 204×
• Michael McCarthy Arthur Waskow v. Richard G. Kleindienst
  D.C. Circuit· 1984-08-17· cited 159×
• Hartman v. Duffey
  D.C. Circuit· 1994-04-05· cited 130×
• Trief v. Dun & Bradstreet Corp.
  S.D. New York· 1992-09-22· cited 91×
• Babineau v. Federal Express Corp.
  Eleventh Circuit· 2009-07-27· cited 85×
• Livengood Feeds, Inc. v. Kgaa
  District of Columbia· 2002-02-25· cited 75×
• Rodolico v. Unisys Corp.
  E.D. New York· 2001-03-30· cited 57×
• Cummings v. Connell
  Ninth Circuit· 2003-01-09· cited 56×
• In re Marsh Erisa Litigation
  S.D. New York· 2010-01-29· cited 40×