Twelve John Does v. District of Columbia, Appellants/cross-Appellees, Nathaniel McQueen Appellees/cross-Appellants

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that \the district court's experience overseeing the case for nearly two decades\ had given it \a unique familiarity with the issues and the performance of class counsel\
• stating that if a party does not respond to a motion, the court may treat the motion as conceded
• noting that a district court acts within its power in relying on the absence of a response as a basis for treating a motion as conceded
• noting that the “use of a subclass [is useful] . . . where the named representative cannot be found to adequately represent all the interests in the class”
• observing that “[w]here the district court relies on the absence of a response as a basis for treating the motion as conceded, [the Circuit will] honor its enforcement of the rule”
• observing that “[w]here the district court relies on the absence of a response as a basis for treating the motion as conceded, [the Circuit will] honor its enforcement of the rule”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).