Skip to main content

Finley v. State

Citations

  • 685 S.E.2d 258
  • 286 Ga. 47
  • 2009 Fulton County D. Rep. 3171
  • 2009 Ga. LEXIS 512

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting claim based on trial judge’s interposing several questions to several witnesses because “the transcript reveal[ed] no expression or intimation of opinion by the trial court in the exchanges at issue”
  • “A trial judge may propound questions to a witness to develop the truth of the case or to clarify testimony, and the extent of such an examination is a matter for the trial court’s discretion.”
  • “[W]ords alone cannot constitute serious provocation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hunstein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.