Harmoni Int'l Spice, Inc. v. Robert Hume

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant’s fraudulent requests for an agency to investigate defendant’s competitor made both the agency and the competitor direct victims
• finding proximate cause where plaintiff was “forced to 13 incur significant expenses responding to an administrative review because refusing to 14 respond was not a viable option.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Pat District Council 82 v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals Company
  Ninth Circuit· 2019-12-03· cited 36×
• City of Almaty v. Viktor Khrapunov
  Ninth Circuit· 2020-04-22· cited 19×
• Ashley Albert v. Global TelLink Corp.
  Fourth Circuit· 2023-05-25· cited 4×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ashcroft v. Iqbal
  Supreme Court· 2009-05-18· cited 149,772×
• Lexmark Int'l, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 2014-03-25· cited 2,704×
• Eminence Capital, Llc, and Jay Spechler v. Aspeon, Inc. Richard P. Stack
  Ninth Circuit· 2003-01-21· cited 2,332×
• Holmes v. Securities Investor Protection Corporation
  Supreme Court· 1992-03-24· cited 1,453×
• Bridge v. Phoenix Bond & Indemnity Co.
  Supreme Court· 2008-06-09· cited 806×
• Anza v. Ideal Steel Supply Corp.
  Supreme Court· 2006-06-05· cited 587×
• Ruth E. Oscar Charles Spinosa v. University Students Co-Operative Association George Proper
  Ninth Circuit· 1992-06-04· cited 344×
• RJR Nabisco, Inc. v. European Cmty.
  Supreme Court· 2016-06-20· cited 285×
• Diaz v. Gates
  Ninth Circuit· 2005-08-16· cited 131×
• Mendoza v. Zirkle Fruit Co.
  Ninth Circuit· 2002-09-03· cited 49×