Skip to main content
· 10/12/1988

Harman v. Lyphomed, Inc.

Citations

  • 122 F.R.D. 522
  • 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11579
  • 1988 WL 112615

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]he error of surprising a litigant with new evidence is sufficient to grant a new trial.”
  • “[T]he error of surprising a litigant 2 with new evidence is sufficient to grant a new trial[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.