Skip to main content
· 7/30/1992

Weinberger v. Great Northern Nekoosa Corp.

Citations

  • 801 F. Supp. 804
  • 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12073
  • 1992 WL 187754

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • disallowing incidental expenses, including secretarial overtime, in request for Attorney fees and costs
  • declining to permit reimbursement for computer research, finding it attributed to firm overhead
  • inadequate documentation and document review subject to reduction
  • “The Court thinks it inappropriate and unreasonable to permit an overhead item of this type to be recovered in addition to recovery for the time of the lawyer who used the research facility.” (quoting Auburn Police Union v. Tierney, 762 F. Supp. 3, 5 (D. Me. 1991))
  • paralegal time subject to reduction
  • co-counsel conferences subject to reduction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gene Carter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.