Tex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 6/27/2001
Hardy v. State
Citations
- 50 S.W.3d 689
- 2001 Tex. App. LEXIS 4458
- 2001 WL 739242
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that “[w]e view Rumfolo as requiring the State to make a prima facie showing that the property in question is contraband subject to forfeiture”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Davis, Vance, Gray
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Hardy v. StateTexas Supreme Court· 2003-04-03· cited 122×
- Byrd v. Estate of NelmsTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2004-11-17· cited 62×
- One Ford Mustang, VIN 1FAFP40471F207859 v. StateTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2007-07-18· cited 29×
- Texas v. Ysleta Del Sur PuebloW.D. Texas· 2002-06-24· cited 11×
- TWENTY-NINE (29) GAMBLING DEVICES v. StateTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2003-04-25· cited 10×
- Allstar Amusement v. StateTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2001-08-08· cited 9×
- in the Interest of B.R.S. and A.N.S., ChildrenTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2005-05-25· cited 9×
- Mark Ken Tafel v. StateTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2016-08-31· cited 4×
- In Re BRSTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2005-06-21
- Unnamed caseTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2009-01-29
- Unnamed caseTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2009-01-29
- Unnamed caseTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2009-01-29
- Twenty-Nine Gambling Devices v. StateTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2003-04-25
- James H. Byrd, W.D. Culwell, William R. Dean v. the Estate of H.G. NelmsTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2004-11-17
- Robert Ford v. StateTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2004-08-18
- William Brian Fennell v. StateTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2005-09-14
- Lorenzo Gomez, as the and Representative of the Estate of Agapito Gomez v. Texas Windstorm Insurance AssociationTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2006-03-23
Cites
27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Sterner v. Marathon Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court· 1989-03-08· cited 1,465×
- Ortiz v. JonesTexas Supreme Court· 1996-04-12· cited 1,343×
- United States v. UrserySupreme Court· 1996-06-24· cited 1,314×
- Croucher v. CroucherTexas Supreme Court· 1983-11-02· cited 1,105×
- University of Texas Medical School at Houston v. ThanTexas Supreme Court· 1995-06-22· cited 521×
- Albertson's, Inc. v. SinclairTexas Supreme Court· 1999-03-11· cited 339×
- Robinson v. HanrahanSupreme Court· 1972-10-24· cited 330×
- Vickery v. Commission for Lawyer DisciplineTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 1999-11-18· cited 301×
- LaChance v. EricksonSupreme Court· 1998-01-21· cited 220×
- City of West Covina v. PerkinsSupreme Court· 1999-01-13· cited 212×
- Tune v. Texas Department of Public SafetyTexas Supreme Court· 2000-08-24· cited 145×
- Checker Bag Co. v. WashingtonTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2000-08-30· cited 122×
- Hitzelberger v. Samedan Oil Corp.Tex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 1997-07-23· cited 119×
- Brush v. Reata Oil & Gas Corp.Tex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 1998-12-16· cited 96×
- United States v. $506,231 in United States CurrencySeventh Circuit· 1997-09-03· cited 77×
- Waldrep v. Texas Employers Insurance Ass'nTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2000-07-27· cited 59×
- State v. RumfoloTexas Supreme Court· 1976-12-31· cited 48×
- Markowski v. City of MarlinTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 1997-01-22· cited 39×
- Crow v. BurnettTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 1997-08-20· cited 30×
- State v. One Super Cherry Master Video 8-Liner MacHineTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2001-06-14· cited 25×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.