Supreme Court· 10/24/1972
Robinson v. Hanrahan
Citations
- 409 U.S. 38
- 93 S. Ct. 30
- 34 L. Ed. 2d 47
- 1972 U.S. LEXIS 17
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a notice of forfeiture sent to an owner’s home was inadequate when the state had knowledge that the owner was in prison
- holding that notice of forfeiture proceedings sent to a vehicle owner’s address of record was inadequate where the state knew that the property owner was in prison
- holding that mailing that the government knew would not accomplish notice was insufficient
- holding that service regarding state foreclosure proceedings sent to the last known address of a prisoner was not “reasonably calculated” to reach the prisoner when the State knew that the prisoner was not at the address to which the notice was mailed
- holding notice of forfeiture sent to address State knew to be inaccurate or defective insufficient
- holding notice of forfeiture sent to address State knew to be inaccurate or defective insufficient
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
219 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Calero-Toledo v. Pearson Yacht Leasing Co.Supreme Court· 1974-06-17· cited 1,276×
- Dusenbery v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2002-01-08· cited 924×
- Jones v. FlowersSupreme Court· 2006-04-26· cited 901×
- In the Matter of Cohoes Industrial Terminal, Inc., Debtor. Leon C. Baker, Cross-Appellee v. Latham Sparrowbush Associates, Cross-AppellantSecond Circuit· 1991-05-01· cited 171×
- Josephine Weigner v. The City of New YorkSecond Circuit· 1988-07-14· cited 166×
- United States v. Ceverilo ChambersThird Circuit· 1999-09-13· cited 132×
- Unnamed caseThird Circuit· 2000-05-24· cited 127×
- United States v. GiraldoFirst Circuit· 1995-01-19· cited 115×
- Jorge Sarit and Dennie Espaillat v. U.S. Drug Enforcement AdministrationFirst Circuit· 1993-02-23· cited 114×
- United States v. Norman Ray WoodallEighth Circuit· 1993-12-28· cited 112×
- Andre Lopez Polanco v. U.S. Drug Enforcement AdministrationSecond Circuit· 1998-10-15· cited 111×
- United States v. Reginald McGloryThird Circuit· 2000-02-01· cited 110×
- Dow v. State of MichiganMichigan Supreme Court· 1976-04-01· cited 99×
- People v. SansoneAppellate Court of Illinois· 1974-03-12· cited 77×
- In Re Possession & Control of the Commissioner of BanksAppellate Court of Illinois· 2001-12-28· cited 76×
- Palazzi v. Estate of GardnerOhio Supreme Court· 1987-08-26· cited 76×
- Livonia v. Town of RomeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1998-02-27· cited 74×
- United States v. DiazEleventh Circuit· 1999-09-30· cited 72×
- Department of Liquor Control v. Sons of Italy Lodge 0917Ohio Supreme Court· 1992-12-30· cited 72×
- Snider International Corporation v. Town of Forest Heights, MDFourth Circuit· 2014-01-07· cited 71×
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court· 1950-06-05· cited 10,395×
- Schroeder v. City of New YorkSupreme Court· 1962-12-17· cited 569×
- City of New York v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court· 1953-01-12· cited 500×
- Walker v. City of HutchinsonSupreme Court· 1956-12-10· cited 459×
- Covey v. Town of SomersSupreme Court· 1956-05-07· cited 240×
- People Ex Rel. Hanrahan v. One 1965 OldsmobileIllinois Supreme Court· 1972-03-30· cited 37×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.