Skip to main content

Hardy v. State

Citations

  • 716 So. 2d 761
  • 1998 WL 306613

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding trial court did not abuse discretion in finding defendant competent where there was conflicting expert testimony regarding the defendant's competency
  • holding trial court did not abuse discretion in finding defendant competent where there was conflicting expert testimony regarding the defendant's competency
  • holding testimony from jail employees regarding a defendant's conduct is relevant in determining competency
  • affirming admission of defendant's statement of intent made up to two months prior to murder
  • affirming circuit court finding of competency where supported by testimony of three out of five experts, testimony from jail employees regarding prisoner's abilities to communicate and participate in activities, and circuit court's own observations of demeanor and ability to assist counsel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.