Skip to main content
· 12/30/2004

Hanson Pipe & Products, Inc. v. BRIDGE TECHNOLOGIES LLC

Citations

  • 351 F. Supp. 2d 603
  • 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26194
  • 2004 WL 3037719

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • if a reply brief raised a new argument, the “sur-reply would have been the appropriate time to counter [that] argument”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.