Skip to main content
· 10/8/1969

Hanberry v. Hearst Corp.

Citations

  • 276 Cal. App. 2d 680
  • 81 Cal. Rptr. 519
  • 39 A.L.R. 3d 173
  • 1969 Cal. App. LEXIS 1852

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[I]ts seal and certification tend to induce and encourage consumers to purchase products advertised in the magazine and which bear that seal and certification.”
  • “[I]ts seal and certification tend to induce and encourage consumers to purchase products advertised in the magazine and which bear that seal and certification.”
  • Good Housekeeping held liable for defective product because it had given the product its “Good Housekeeping’s Consumer’s Guaranty Seal,” whereby publisher had made an independent examination of the product and issued an express, limited warranty

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ault

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.