Hanberry v. Hearst Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[I]ts seal and certification tend to induce and encourage consumers to purchase products advertised in the magazine and which bear that seal and certification.”
• “[I]ts seal and certification tend to induce and encourage consumers to purchase products advertised in the magazine and which bear that seal and certification.”
• Good Housekeeping held liable for defective product because it had given the product its “Good Housekeeping’s Consumer’s Guaranty Seal,” whereby publisher had made an independent examination of the product and issued an express, limited warranty

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• T.H. v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
  California Supreme Court· 2017-12-21· cited 239×
• Artiglio v. Corning Inc.
  California Supreme Court· 1998-07-09· cited 200×
• Carmichael v. Reitz
  California Court of Appeal· 1971-05-27· cited 127×
• Osborn v. Irwin Memorial Blood Bank
  California Court of Appeal· 1992-04-08· cited 100×
• Kasel v. Remington Arms Co.
  California Court of Appeal· 1972-04-04· cited 96×
• Conte v. Wyeth, Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 2008-11-07· cited 89×
• Garcia v. Superior Court
  California Supreme Court· 1990-05-03· cited 65×
• Connelly v. State of California
  California Court of Appeal· 1970-01-21· cited 52×
• Yassin v. Certified Grocers of Illinois, Inc.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1986-12-09· cited 49×
• Henderson v. Security Nat. Bank
  California Court of Appeal· 1977-08-22· cited 49×
• Friedman v. Merck & Co.
  California Court of Appeal· 2003-03-26· cited 39×
• Yuhas v. Mudge
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1974-07-01· cited 37×
• Theresa Huck v. Wyeth, Inc. D/B/A Wyeth Schwarz Pharma, Inc. and Pliva, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 2014-07-11· cited 37×
• Bay Summit Community Assn. v. Shell Oil Co.
  California Court of Appeal· 1996-12-16· cited 36×
• Lacher v. Superior Court
  California Court of Appeal· 1991-05-29· cited 28×
• Wilhelm Winter Cynthia Zheng v. G.P. Putnam's Sons
  Ninth Circuit· 1991-07-12· cited 25×
• Hale v. George A. Hormel & Co.
  California Court of Appeal· 1975-05-09· cited 24×
• Krupnick v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
  California Court of Appeal· 1994-09-09· cited 19×
• Rottinghaus v. Howell
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1983-06-21· cited 18×
• FNS Mortgage Service Corp. v. Pacific General Group, Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 1994-05-12· cited 18×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Biakanja v. Irving
  California Supreme Court· 1958-01-17· cited 586×
• Vandermark v. Ford Motor Co.
  California Supreme Court· 1964-04-21· cited 384×
• Gagne v. Bertran
  California Supreme Court· 1954-10-19· cited 253×
• Connor v. Great Western Savings & Loan Ass'n
  California Supreme Court· 1968-12-12· cited 203×
• Merrill v. Buck
  California Supreme Court· 1962-10-23· cited 46×
• County of Los Angeles v. Law Bldg. Corp.
  California Court of Appeal· 1967-10-02· cited 12×
• Shirreffs v. Alta Canyada Corp.
  California Court of Appeal· 1935-08-14· cited 8×
• Bennett v. International Shoe Co.
  California Court of Appeal· 1969-08-25· cited 3×