Rottinghaus v. Howell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming trial court’s conclusion that disclaimer of standard warranties was material alteration as matter of law, citing Comment 4
• affirming trial court’s conclusion that disclaimer of standard warranties was material alteration as matter of law, citing Comment 4
• “MPIA’s conduct in certifying the defective seed, issuing a blue tag stating such and representing the quality of the seed in the 1977 directory created an issue for the jury as to whether defendant was liable for negligence and negligent misrepresentation.”
• “MPIA’s conduct in certifying the defective seed, issuing a blue tag stating such and representing the quality of the seed in the 1977 directory created an issue for the jury as to whether defendant was liable for negligence and negligent misrepresentation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).