Hamrick v. Franklin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• [T]he plaintiffs have the burden of showing that the defendants' conduct was not within the scope of employment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Gutierrez De Martinez v. Lamagno
  Supreme Court· 1995-06-14· cited 571×
• Green v. Hall
  Ninth Circuit· 1993-10-29· cited 88×
• Williams v. United States
  Fifth Circuit· 1995-12-13· cited 67×
• Garcia v. United States
  Fifth Circuit· 1995-08-25· cited 36×
• Palmer v. Flaggman
  Fifth Circuit· 1996-09-03· cited 33×
• Richman v. Straley
  Tenth Circuit· 1995-02-14· cited 19×
• Turner v. United States
  N.D. Illinois· 2010-03-31· cited 1×
• Garcia v. United States
  Fifth Circuit· 1994-06-10
• Wood v. United States Of
  First Circuit· 1993-04-30

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Smith
  Supreme Court· 1991-03-20· cited 361×
• Melo v. Hafer
  Third Circuit· 1990-08-21· cited 236×
• Sheila Arbour, Personal Representative of the Estate of Victor Arbour v. Eugene Jenkins
  Sixth Circuit· 1990-05-15· cited 107×
• Nicholas Nasuti v. James Scannell, Nicholas Nasuti v. James Scannell, United States of America, in Re United States of America and James Scannell
  First Circuit· 1990-06-29· cited 96×
• S.J. & W. Ranch, Inc. v. Dexter Lehtinen and United States of America
  Eleventh Circuit· 1990-10-10· cited 94×
• Mitchell v. Carlson
  Fifth Circuit· 1990-03-15· cited 87×
• Aviles v. Lutz
  Tenth Circuit· 1989-10-17· cited 74×
• Hamrick v. Franklin
  Seventh Circuit· 1991-05-08· cited 43×
• Petrousky v. United States
  N.D. New York· 1990-01-16· cited 13×