Skip to main content
Fifth Circuit· 3/15/1990

Mitchell v. Carlson

Citations

  • 896 F.2d 128
  • 1990 WL 17168

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reviewing portion of remand order that resubstituted an individual defendant for the United States, and thus destroyed diversity jurisdiction, because it necessarily preceded the remand and would not be reviewed by the state court
  • “[T]he district court subjected [the substituted party] to the burden of defending a suit in state court, a burden from which she is entitled to be immune.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis, Garza, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

62 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Mitchell v. Carlson

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.