Hammock v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “A demonstration of unpreparedness for trial which is developed after the 180-day period has elapsed, and which has no record support during the 180-day period, does not toll the speedy trial rule.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Muller v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-09-16· cited 17×
• Ehn v. Smith
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-02-02· cited 8×
• Ballard v. Kaney
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-05-13· cited 6×
• Hill v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1985-04-04· cited 5×
• Christopher v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1979-03-23· cited 2×
• Henshaw v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-12-02· cited 2×
• State v. Guyton
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-02-15· cited 2×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Miranda v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
• Hogan v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1974-11-07· cited 6×