Skip to main content

Muller v. State

Citations

  • 387 So. 2d 1037

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying Llanusa to post-expiration continuance taken prior to the filing of a motion for discharge
  • “In the absence of an order of extension entered by the trial court during the speedy trial period, we will not find that the time was extended, no matter how compelling or exceptional the circumstances may appear”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hendry, Nesbitt and Daniel S. Pearson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.