Supreme Court of Florida· 11/23/1921
Daniels v. State
Citations
- 82 Fla. 387
- 90 So. 159
Syllabus
<p>Where there is substantial competent evidence to support the verdict and there is nothing to indicate that the jury were influenced hy considerations outside the evidence, the verdict will not be disturbed.</p>
Judges: Browne, Ellis, Taylor, West, Whitfield
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Wallace v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1918-08-05· cited 17×
- Hamlin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1920-07-10· cited 11×
- Witt v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1920-06-12· cited 9×
- Drayton v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1919-08-01· cited 8×
- Habersham v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1920-07-10· cited 5×
- Brooke v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1920-06-25· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.