Skip to main content

Hamilton v. State

Citations

  • 547 So. 2d 630
  • 1989 WL 84107

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • aggravating circumstances and judgment of guilt reversed, remanded for new trial
  • statement not admissible under the excited utterance exception where declarant had two and one-half hours at a shooting scene to overhear deputies, investigators, and others
  • reversible error where request for additional peremptory challenge to backstrike specific juror denied
  • \`A juror is not impartial when one side must overcome a preconceived opinion in order to prevail.'\ ( quoting Hill v. State, 477 So.2d 553, 556 (Fla. 1985))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

41 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.