Skip to main content

Wilkins v. State

Citations

  • 607 So. 2d 500
  • 1992 WL 324846

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding trial court erred by keeping juror who stated his family’s similar experience “shouldn’t make any difference [in his decision], but [he] couldn’t definitely say whether it would”
  • stating that evidence that the defendant and his wife considered having an abortion of a baby-victim who was born and died later as “excludable . . . as . . . an impermissible assault on the defendant’s character and was otherwise irrelevant and inflammatory”
  • calling evidence that the defendant and his wife considered having an abortion of the baby-victim “excludable ... as ... an impermissible assault on the defendant’s character and was otherwise irrelevant and inflammatory”
  • calling evidence that the defendant and his wife considered having an abortion of the baby-victim \excludable ... as ... an impermissible assault on the defendant's character and was otherwise irrelevant and inflammatory\
  • calling evidence that the defendant and his wife considered having an abortion of the baby-victim “excludable . . . as . . . an impermissible assault on the defendant’s character” and “otherwise irrelevant and inflammatory”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schwartz, C.J., and Barkdull and Hubbart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.