Second Circuit· 12/29/2009
Halebian v. Berv
Citations
- 590 F.3d 195
- 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 28531
- 2009 WL 5101758
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that, regardless of its legality, there was no evidence that Trustees knew that “echo-voting” was illegal or that they misled investors in Proxy Statement
- stating that Rule 23.1 is a “rule of pleading that creates a federal standard” enabling federal courts to evaluate whether a plaintiff has adequately pleaded a claim under substantive state law
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sack and Parker, Circuit Judges, and Stanceu, Judge
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Halebian v. BervSecond Circuit· 2011-05-06· cited 268×
- In re Facebook, Inc.Second Circuit· 2015-07-24· cited 63×
- Transeo S.A.R.L. v. Bessemer Venture Partners VI L.P.S.D. New York· 2013-03-29· cited 59×
- Espinoza v. DimonSecond Circuit· 2015-08-12· cited 44×
- MBIA Inc. v. Federal InsuranceSecond Circuit· 2011-07-01· cited 38×
- Saltz v. FIRST FRONTIER, LPS.D. New York· 2010-12-23· cited 34×
- Lukas Ex Rel. Miller Energy Resources, Inc. v. McPeakSixth Circuit· 2013-09-19· cited 20×
- Nelson Gomes v. American Century CompaniesEighth Circuit· 2013-03-28· cited 16×
- Seidl v. American Century Companies, Inc.S.D. New York· 2010-05-07· cited 14×
- Cottrell Ex Rel. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukeEighth Circuit· 2016-07-22· cited 13×
- Eli Wilamowsky v. Take-two Interactive Software, Inc.S.D. New York· 2011-09-30· cited 12×
- Morefield v. BaileyE.D. Virginia· 2013-08-06· cited 12×
- Unión De Empleados De Muelles De Puerto Rico PRSSA Welfare Plan v. UBS Financial Services Inc.First Circuit· 2013-01-04· cited 11×
- Cordts-Auth v. Crunk, LLCS.D. New York· 2011-09-27· cited 10×
- Canty v. DayS.D. New York· 2014-04-09· cited 6×
- Louisiana Municipal Police Employees' Retirement System v. HesseS.D. New York· 2013-07-26· cited 6×
- Steinberg v. MoziloS.D. New York· 2015-09-29· cited 4×
- In re Bank of New York Mellon Corp. Forex Transactions LitigationS.D. New York· 2013-07-02· cited 3×
- Beckworth ex rel. Discount Trophy & Co. v. BizierD. Connecticut· 2015-09-29· cited 2×
- Campbell v. Weihe YuS.D. New York· 2014-06-10· cited 1×
Cites
51 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court· 2009-05-18· cited 149,772×
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court· 2007-05-21· cited 146,720×
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court· 1949-06-20· cited 10,863×
- Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc.Second Circuit· 2002-02-21· cited 4,118×
- Alexander v. SandovalSupreme Court· 2001-04-24· cited 2,468×
- Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court· 1991-05-20· cited 1,291×
- Ross v. BernhardSupreme Court· 1969-11-10· cited 1,046×
- Burks v. LaskerSupreme Court· 1979-05-14· cited 435×
- Demoulas v. Demoulas Super Markets, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1997-03-13· cited 394×
- Daily Income Fund, Inc. v. FoxSupreme Court· 1984-01-18· cited 281×
- Velez v. LevySecond Circuit· 2005-03-11· cited 224×
- In Re Tyson Foods, Inc. Consolidated Shareholder LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware· 2007-02-06· cited 192×
- Robertson v. Gaston Snow & Ely BartlettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1989-04-06· cited 180×
- Nieves v. University of Puerto RicoFirst Circuit· 1993-10-18· cited 116×
- Harhen v. BrownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2000-06-27· cited 98×
- In Re JP Morgan Chase & Co.Supreme Court of Delaware· 2006-03-08· cited 80×
- Foxworth v. St. AmandFirst Circuit· 2009-06-29· cited 79×
- Boston Gas Company v. Century IndemnityFirst Circuit· 2008-06-10· cited 71×
- Sidney Olmsted v. Pruco Life Insurance Company Of New JerseySecond Circuit· 2002-03-07· cited 71×
- Sealy Mattress Co. of New Jersey v. Sealy, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware· 1987-07-24· cited 62×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.