Skip to main content
· 9/30/2011

Eli Wilamowsky v. Take-two Interactive Software, Inc.

Citations

  • 818 F. Supp. 2d 744
  • 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 112428
  • 2011 WL 4542754

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an Ohio county can be sued under § 1983 through its board of commissioners
  • holding that an Ohio county is “precluded from claiming protection from suit in federal court on grounds of lack of capacity under Section 301.22 of the Ohio Revised Code.”
  • holding that punitive and emotional distress damages are unavailable under the FMLA
  • noting that the juvenile court is a subdivision of the Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas
  • apparently assuming an award of attorney fees would constitute retroactive relief prohibited by sovereign immunity
  • “A second example of where the immunity given to a county has been waived is set forth in Section 301.22.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sullivan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.