Nelson Gomes v. American Century Companies

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that Seidl better stated Maryland law on the issue of demand futility
• rejecting argument that investment fund fiduciaries “could not fairly consider a demand because they were responsible for the [f]unds’ illegal actions and w[ould] be liable if [the] claim succeed[ed]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).