Skip to main content

Hale v. Shear Express, Inc.

Citations

  • 946 So. 2d 94
  • 2006 WL 3813734

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that a reduction of the requested fee is an abuse of discretion if “based on the judge’s subjective belief and personal experience”
  • reiterating that unsworn responses and arguments of counsel are not evidence upon which a JCC may rely
  • reversing an award of fees because the judge’s findings “appear to have been based on the judge’s subjective belief and personal experience” and not competent, substantial evidence
  • relying on Smyth v. K-Mart Corp., 905 So.2d 921, 921 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Webster

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Hale v. Shear Express, Inc.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.