Mercy Hospital v. Holmes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding JCC’s conclusion as to factual issues will be affirmed if record contains competent, substantial evidence to support it
• holding JCC's conclusion as to factual issues will be affirmed if record contains competent, substantial evidence to support it
• “[T]he standard of review in worker’s compensation cases is whether competent substantial evidence supports the decision below, not whether it is possible to recite contradictory record evidence which supported the arguments rejected below.”
• “the standard of review in worker’s [sic] compensation cases is whether competent substantial evidence supports the decision below, not whether it is possible to recite contradictory record evidence which supported the arguments rejected below”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).