· 4/19/2010
Hale v. Sharp Healthcare
Citations
- 183 Cal. App. 4th 1373
- 108 Cal. Rptr. 3d 669
- 2010 Cal. App. LEXIS 530
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that Nifty failed to plausibly allege 13 actual reliance by anyone, even a consumer
- “Prevention of performance by one party to a contract excuses performance by the other party.”
- reliance required even on non-fraud prong of UCL
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McCONNELL
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.