Skip to main content

Hale v. Brown

Citations

  • 323 P.2d 955
  • 84 Ariz. 61
  • 1958 Ariz. LEXIS 187

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • it is a “well-established and deeply-rooted legal principle that a person has the right to vindicate any trespass upon his legal rights by an action in tort for at least nominal damages” (Phelps and Struck-meyer, JJ., dissenting)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Udall, Phelps, Struckmeyer, Windes, Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.