Skip to main content
· 3/11/1966

Tovrea Land and Cattle Company v. Linsenmeyer

Citations

  • 412 P.2d 47
  • 100 Ariz. 107
  • 1966 Ariz. LEXIS 223

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that subject matter jurisdiction is a question of law we review de novo
  • holding corporation president who borrowed money from corporation to purchase corporate shares did not usurp corporate opportunity
  • stating “[tjhere must be positive acts of concealment done to prevent detection ... some trick or contrivance intended to exclude suspicion and prevent inquiry”
  • noting that 26 breach of business opportunity doctrine occurs when a director, in violation of his fiduciary duty, hinders or usurps a business opportunity that the director’s corporation has an actual 27 or expectant interest in
  • noting that civil conspiracy is 10 not a standalone cause of action
  • searching the record to determine whether the defendant “wrongfully deprived” the plaintiff of a business opportunity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bernstein, Struckmeyer, Udall, Lockwood, McFarland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.