West Virginia Supreme Court· 12/10/2003

Haislop v. Edgell

Citations

593 S.E.2d 839
215 W. Va. 88

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

observing that legislation which is civil “would not implicate the ex post facto clause,” whereas legislation which is punitive “would violate the clause.”
observing that legislation which is civil “would not implicate the ex post facto clause,” whereas legislation which is punitive “would violate the clause.”
state registry is regulatory and does not violate prohibition against ex post facto laws even though applied to persons convicted before its enactment
same from appeal of denial of motion to dismiss indictment for alleged failure to comply with OCGA § 42- 6-20, Article IV (e)
upholding sex offender registration statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McGraw, Starcher, Archer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.