Skip to main content
· 7/16/2004

Slansky v. Nebraska State Patrol

Citations

  • 268 Neb. 360
  • 685 N.W.2d 335
  • 2004 Neb. LEXIS 126

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • determining that SORA’s prenotification hearing comports with due process
  • “under the Ex Post Facto Clause, the retroactive application of civil disabilities and sanctions is permitted; only retroactive criminal punishment for past acts is prohibited”
  • rejecting challenge to breadth of SORA’s notification provisions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hendry, Connolly, Gerrard, Stephan, McCormack, Miller-Lerman, Wright

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.