Ninth Circuit· 10/7/1946
Haid v. United States
Citations
- 157 F.2d 630
- 1946 U.S. App. LEXIS 2763
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- victim’s testimony as to his state of mind in relying upon representations held relevant
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Denman, Bone, Orr
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- United States v. Hilda Escobar De BrightNinth Circuit· 1984-03-29· cited 146×
- United States v. Earl BushSeventh Circuit· 1975-09-04· cited 120×
- John Milton Phillips, Jr., Jack Cecil Cherbo and Richard Dale Walker v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1966-03-22· cited 52×
- Jerome D. Linden, Robert R. Baylis, Classified Business Directory, Inc., and Directory Listings, Inc. v. United StatesFourth Circuit· 1958-04-09· cited 48×
- Herman Krogmann and Emil Klauss v. United StatesSixth Circuit· 1955-08-16· cited 47×
- David Farrell and Oliver J. Farrell v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1963-09-17· cited 39×
- Sam Hoover v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsFifth Circuit· 1971-03-09· cited 29×
- Jack A. Lemon and Martin De Bruin v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1960-03-30· cited 28×
- Alfred G. Sica v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1964-01-13· cited 21×
- James Butler Elkins and Raymond Frederick Clark v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1959-05-28· cited 20×
- Adolfson v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1947-02-06· cited 19×
- Ples Elworth Russell, and Roy Russell v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1961-03-25· cited 16×
- Osborn v. Sinclair Refining CompanyD. Maryland· 1959-02-24· cited 4×
- Hoover v. BetoS.D. Texas· 1969-11-18· cited 4×
- United States v. David De Costa BushrodNinth Circuit· 1985-06-17· cited 3×
- United States v. Hilda Escobar DebrightNinth Circuit· 1983-07-21· cited 2×
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.