Skip to main content
· 3/29/1984

United States v. Hilda Escobar De Bright

Citations

  • 730 F.2d 1255
  • 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 24076

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that deception by the use of such precatory terms as “I believe” will not defeat a perjury charge
  • rejecting proposition that Kahn requires that only those for whom there is probable cause to believe that person is committing criminal activity may be named in wiretap application
  • “[vjacating unreviewed sentences under the concurrent sentence doctrine is a fundamentally erroneous practice”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Browning, Goodwin, Wallace, Anderson, Hug, Skopil, Fletcher, Pregerson, Ferguson, Nelson, Boochever

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.