D. Delaware· 12/30/1993
Haft v. Dart Group Corp.
Citations
- 841 F. Supp. 549
- 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18846
- 1993 WL 556938
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- a new contract supersedes an old one where they govern the same subject matter and cannot coexist, or where parties expressly intend for the new contract to supersede the old one
- discussing § 142 in the context of a corporate president
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Murray M. Schwartz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Yolton v. El Paso Tennessee Pipeline Co.Sixth Circuit· 2006-01-17· cited 31×
- Zupnick v. GoizuetaCourt of Chancery of Delaware· 1997-01-21· cited 16×
- Merisant Co. v. McNeil Nutritionals, LLCE.D. Pennsylvania· 2007-03-02· cited 11×
- Leonard v. University of DelawareD. Delaware· 2002-05-24· cited 11×
- Isaacs v. American Iron & Steel Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2004-12-28· cited 10×
- Cryovac Inc. v. Pechiney Plastic Packaging, Inc.D. Delaware· 2006-04-17· cited 9×
- Clean Harbors, Inc. v. Arkema, Inc. (In Re Safety-Kleen Corp.)D. Delaware· 2008-01-03· cited 8×
- Patriot Scientific Corp. v. KorodiS.D. California· 2007-05-25· cited 8×
- Frazier v. American Airlines, Inc.D. Delaware· 2006-05-25· cited 8×
- Manchester Equipment Co. v. American Way Moving & Storage Co.D. Delaware· 2001-12-11· cited 6×
- KBQ, INC. v. EI DuPONT DE NEMOURS AND CO.D. Massachusetts· 1998-05-21· cited 5×
- Avesair, Inc. v. Inphonic, Inc.North Carolina Business Court· 2007-10-16· cited 2×
- Gladys Yolton v. El Paso Tennessee Pipeline Co.Sixth Circuit· 2006-01-17· cited 1×
- Fleming & Hall, Ltd. v. CopeD. Delaware· 1998-11-25· cited 1×
- Manchester Equip. v. AMERICAN WAY MOVING & STORAGED. Delaware· 2001-12-11
- Craig Coates v. Parnassus Systems, Inc. D/B/A Stormwater Research Group Jeffrey Caudill Mark Bohrer Michael Mixon And Rene AdameTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2002-04-11
- Centrella v. Avantor, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware· 2024-07-01
Cites
87 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court· 1938-04-25· cited 18,491×
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court· 1941-06-02· cited 8,668×
- Precision Instrument Manufacturing Co. v. Automotive Maintenance MacHinery Co.Supreme Court· 1945-04-23· cited 1,028×
- Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co.Third Circuit· 1976-04-02· cited 852×
- Rhone-Poulenc Basic Chemicals Co. v. American Motorists Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1992-11-18· cited 606×
- Sondra L. McKenna and James R. McKenna v. Ortho Pharmaceutical CorporationThird Circuit· 1980-06-17· cited 390×
- National State Bank v. Federal Reserve Bank of New York Community Guardian Bank Uniport Company, Inc. Sang B. Lee Federal Reserve Bank of New YorkThird Circuit· 1992-11-24· cited 271×
- Citadel Holding Corp. v. RovenSupreme Court of Delaware· 1992-02-18· cited 235×
- Roberts v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court· 1980-11-03· cited 234×
- Country Floors, Inc. v. A Partnership Composed of Charley Gepner and Gary Ford, D/B/A Country TilesThird Circuit· 1991-04-16· cited 217×
- Loughran v. LoughranSupreme Court· 1934-04-30· cited 183×
- Delong Corporation v. Raymond International, IncThird Circuit· 1980-04-14· cited 167×
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. LakeSupreme Court of Delaware· 1991-07-02· cited 152×
- Michelson v. DuncanSupreme Court of Delaware· 1979-10-02· cited 142×
- Gaudiosi v. MellonThird Circuit· 1959-06-24· cited 92×
- Glover v. Herald Co.Supreme Court· 1977-11-28· cited 91×
- Michael McMonagle v. Northeast Women's Center, IncSupreme Court· 1989-10-10· cited 89×
- Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co. of Asbury Park v. Pepsico, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1972-07-12· cited 62×
Other cases named Haft v. Dart Group Corp.
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.