Michael McMonagle v. Northeast Women's Center, Inc

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that anti-abortion protestors could be liable for violations under federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1964(c)
• holding that anti-abortion protestors could be liable for violations under federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1964(c)
• affirming exclusion of evidence relating to justification defense to civil RICO and state trespass claims
• the defendants waived their right to argue on appeal the relevancy of certain evidence by their failure to make an offer of proof at trial as to its relevancy
• the defendants waived their right to argue on appeal the relevancy of certain evidence by their failure to make an offer of proof at trial as to its relevancy
• defendant “could not demonstrate that he was faced with a clear and readily apparent harm, because the law does not recognize abortions as a harm”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).