Skip to main content
· 7/18/1979

McCourt v. Meyers

Citations

  • 407 A.2d 875
  • 268 Pa. Super. 152
  • 1979 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2622

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing the “well-recognized tendency among children … to change their minds and desires from time to time”
  • child’s interest in dog, held, not adequate reason
  • child's interest in dog, held, not adequate reason

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Price, Hester, Montgomery

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.