Parr v. L & L Drive-Inn Restaurant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[t]he claims that have been remediated are no longer in dispute and are therefore moot”
• holding that “[t]he 17 claims that have been remediated are no longer in dispute and are therefore moot”
• finding that plaintiffs desire to patronize defendant’s restaurant free from discrimination a cognizable interest for standing
• finding that 3 creating an accessible route from the accessible parking spaces to the building entrance as readily 4 achievable
• finding that creating an accessible route 8 from the accessible parking spaces to the building entrance as readily achievable
• holding where ADA plaintiff “encounter[s] an architectural 6 barrier,” such plaintiff “should not be required to encounter every barrier seriatim within 7 [defendant’s business] to obtain effective relief”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).