Gust v. Gust
Citations
- 69 Wash. 220
- 124 P. 504
- 1912 Wash. LEXIS 877
Syllabus
<p>Divorce—Suit Money—Alimony Pending Appeal—Showing— Supeiciency. Where the action of a wife for a divorce was dismissed after a full hearing and appears to be without merit, and both parties are possessed of considerable property, and there is no community property, the supreme court will not grant suit money and temporary alimony pending the appeal; since the equities must be so strong or the interests in the property so mutual as to make it a matter of right rather than of privilege.</p>
Judges: Chadwick
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Holcomb v. HolcombWashington Supreme Court· 1909-06-19· cited 26×
- Holcomb v. HolcombWashington Supreme Court· 1908-05-29· cited 13×
- State ex rel. Lloyd v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court· 1909-10-26· cited 12×
- Pringle v. PringleWashington Supreme Court· 1909-09-29· cited 12×
- Gibson v. GibsonWashington Supreme Court· 1912-03-16· cited 11×
- Van Gelder v. Van GelderWashington Supreme Court· 1910-12-10· cited 10×
- Sullivan v. SullivanWashington Supreme Court· 1908-05-29· cited 8×
- Gallagher v. GallagherWashington Supreme Court· 1911-10-13· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.