Gibson v. Gibson
Citations
- 67 Wash. 474
- 122 P. 15
- 1912 Wash. LEXIS 1199
Syllabus
<p>Appeal — Review—Findings—Construction. Where the evidence is brought up on appeal, the findings will not be given a technical construction, but the case will be considered oñ its merits.</p> <p>Divorce — Grounds—Cruelty—Evidence—Sufficiency. A divorce on the ground of cruelty on the part of the wife is justified where it appears that she refused to cohabit with the plaintiff, was guilty of fraud and deceit in securing a marriage without intent to cohabit, and brought an unfounded charge of adultery against him.</p> <p>Divorce — Division of Property — Suit Money — Allowances—Sufficiency. Upon granting a divorce on the ground of cruelty on the part of the wife, who secured the marriage by deceit, allowances to the wife of $600 alimony, $125 suit money, and $750 attorney’s fees and costs, is an ample provision, where there was no community property and the husband, a retired farmer in comfortable circumstances, had already given her $1,000.</p> <p>Divorce — Allowance—Attorney’s Fees. On motion for a new trial in a divorce case, the court has jurisdiction to reopen the case and modify the decree by requiring payment of costs and a further allowance for attorney’s fees.</p> <p>Same — Attorney’s Fees. The allowance of attorney’s fees to the wife in a divorce case is within the sound discretion of the trial court; and no abuse is shown by the allowance of $500 additional, upon denying a motion for a new trial, the preliminary allowance having been $250.</p>
Judges: Gose
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Gust v. GustWashington Supreme Court· 1912-06-26· cited 7×
- Nordlund v. NordlundWashington Supreme Court· 1917-08-03· cited 6×
- Spute v. SputeWashington Supreme Court· 1913-08-11· cited 5×
- Robbins v. Wyman, Partridge & Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1913-10-08· cited 5×
- X. v. X.Superior Court of Delaware· 1946-05-06· cited 3×
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Burnham v. Spokane Mercantile Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1897-12-06· cited 24×
- Kincaid v. Walla Walla Valley Traction Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1910-02-14· cited 13×
- Van Gelder v. Van GelderWashington Supreme Court· 1910-12-10· cited 10×
- Bloom v. BloomWashington Supreme Court· 1910-01-18· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.