Holcomb v. Holcomb
Citations
- 53 Wash. 611
- 102 P. 653
- 1909 Wash. LEXIS 1377
Syllabus
<p>' Divorce — Alimony—Inability to Pay — Contempt—Defenses— Evidence — Sufficiency. Pecuniary inability is a complete defense to contempt proceedings for failure to pay alimony; and the same is established by clear and satisfactory proof, where it appears that the defendant was a dentist, with no property except office furniture and instruments used in his practice, which were subject to a mortgage indebtedness of $1,200 or $1,500, that his income from the date of the decree fell short of his living expenses, and he was hopelessly insolvent.</p>
Judges: Rudkin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Poland v. PolandWashington Supreme Court· 1911-06-22· cited 35×
- Bronson v. SyversonWashington Supreme Court· 1915-11-22· cited 26×
- In re Marriage of WilcoxWashington Supreme Court· 2024-08-08· cited 22×
- Herrett v. HerrettWashington Supreme Court· 1914-07-22· cited 17×
- Snook v. SnookWashington Supreme Court· 1920-03-19· cited 13×
- Pringle v. PringleWashington Supreme Court· 1909-09-29· cited 12×
- Wright v. SuydamWashington Supreme Court· 1914-05-08· cited 11×
- Young v. YoungWashington Supreme Court· 1955-09-29· cited 10×
- Andrews v. McMahanNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1938-12-20· cited 8×
- Gust v. GustWashington Supreme Court· 1912-06-26· cited 7×
- Boyle v. BoyleWashington Supreme Court· 1913-07-31· cited 5×
- Wells v. WellsWashington Supreme Court· 1918-01-16· cited 5×
- Smiley v. SmileyWashington Supreme Court· 1918-01-19· cited 4×
- Dreyer v. DreyerCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1974-02-21· cited 3×
- Miller v. MillerWashington Supreme Court· 1918-09-25· cited 2×
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.