Skip to main content
· 3/26/2004

Gusciara v. Lustig

Citations

  • 806 N.E.2d 746
  • 346 Ill. App. 3d 1012
  • 282 Ill. Dec. 449

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “We hold that, with one exception to be noted, Morgan’s construction of Title VII’s limitations provision applies to the interpretation of section 7A- 102(A)(1) of the Act.”
  • “In construing and applying the [IHRA] . . . Illinois courts have long followed federal cases interpreting Title VII . . . .” (citations omitted); but see id. at 752 (declining to adopt one aspect of Title VII jurisprudence not at issue here

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kapala

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.