Rio Properties, Inc. v. Rio International Interlink, Rio Properties, Inc. v. Rio International Interlink

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, defendant’s local radio and print advertisements in Las Vegas, Nevada, were “something more” than- operating a passive website
• concluding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in allowing service by email after initial attempts at service failed
• concluding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in allowing 25 service by regular mail and e-mail after initial attempts at service failed
• holding that service upon the defendant’s U.S.-based attorney was proper because the attorney had been consulted by the defendant regarding the present lawsuit
• holding that 10 plaintiff must “demonstrate that the facts and circumstances of the present case necessitate[] the 11 district court’s intervention”
• holding that the district court properly 13 |}awarded attorneys’ fees and costs under the Lanham Act on default judgment, taking 14 || plaintiff's allegations as true

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).