· 5/14/2015
Gunn v. McKenna
Citations
- 116 A.3d 419
- 2015 Del. LEXIS 232
- 2015 WL 2405231
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- suggesting that proper defendant in a challenge to conduct by the election officers would be the Department of Elections
- questions directed at subject matter jurisdiction can be raised for the first time on appeal
- “The election contest statute does not apply to actions by two judges of the Superior Court, sitting as the Board of Canvass, and provided no basis for the subject-matter jurisdiction of a single judge of the Superior Court to act in this purported election contest proceeding.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Strine, Holland, Valihura, Vice-Chancellor, Walls
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.