Skip to main content
· 5/14/2015

Gunn v. McKenna

Citations

  • 116 A.3d 419
  • 2015 Del. LEXIS 232
  • 2015 WL 2405231

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • suggesting that proper defendant in a challenge to conduct by the election officers would be the Department of Elections
  • questions directed at subject matter jurisdiction can be raised for the first time on appeal
  • “The election contest statute does not apply to actions by two judges of the Superior Court, sitting as the Board of Canvass, and provided no basis for the subject-matter jurisdiction of a single judge of the Superior Court to act in this purported election contest proceeding.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Strine, Holland, Valihura, Vice-Chancellor, Walls

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.