Skip to main content
· 10/10/1968

Chavin v. H. H. Rosin & Co.

Citations

  • 246 A.2d 921
  • 1968 Del. LEXIS 257

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “It is, of course, axiomatic that Equity has no jurisdiction over a controversy for which there is a complete and adequate remedy at law.”
  • “The object of specific performance is to enforce a plaintiff’s equitable rights, and to compel a defendant to specifically perform his equitable obligations.”
  • “The right to compel the specific performance of a contract is a purely equitable remedy, and is given in substitution of the legal remedy of compensation when it is inadequate.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wolcott, Carey, Christie

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.