Skip to main content
· 8/28/1984

Guel v. Bullock

Citations

  • 468 N.E.2d 811
  • 127 Ill. App. 3d 36
  • 82 Ill. Dec. 264
  • 1984 Ill. App. LEXIS 2245

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • pursuant to the statute of frauds, an attorney lacks authority to sign as the client’s agent unless the attorney’s specific authority to bind the client is in writing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stamos

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.