McMillan v. Ingolia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where no writing expressly authorized the attorney to bind clients to a contract, the attorney’s signature could not have bound his clients for the purposes of the statute of frauds

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Mearida v. Murphy
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1982-05-19· cited 36×
• Bruss v. Klein
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1991-03-05· cited 15×
• Guel v. Bullock
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1984-08-28· cited 13×
• Combined Network, Inc., an Illinois Corporation v. The Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States, a New York Corporation
  Seventh Circuit· 1986-12-16· cited 5×
• In Re Carter
  N.D. Illinois· 2004-05-04· cited 5×
• Cottom v. Kennedy
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1986-01-24· cited 4×
• Van Pelt Construction Company, Inc. v. BMO Harris Bank, N.A.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2014-05-16· cited 2×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Moehling v. W. E. O'Neil Construction Co.
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1960-09-29· cited 60×
• Sanitary District of Chicago v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1917-04-19· cited 18×
• Moehling v. Pierce
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1954-09-23· cited 14×
• Barnett v. Meisterling
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1927-10-22· cited 14×
• Bruns v. Huseman
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1914-12-16· cited 9×
• Lanski v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1927-02-16· cited 8×
• Eidman v. Drewes
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1933-01-23· cited 3×
• Koester v. Litherland
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1933-01-23· cited 2×